rehearing- witnesses
was
and that the presence of all
therefore again required;
in Honghing; secondly, explaining very
fully
wherein I considered the Vice Roy's former fileage against torture to be
insufficient,
and
requiring.
it to be made
No 13
22 May,
May, 1866.
thrown in the
induced the lemnant to
thornighly explicit and comprehensive.
12. These various impediments
way appear to have
investigation as interminable, for
regard
the
he
lignified
Nice Roy to abandon the demand made
his intention of advising
No 12
the
1866
19 may.
for the prisoner
13.
He found however in
am-
336
interview, which he had with the Vice Ray
a
on the 21st of May- that the latter was resolved to follow up the case, and was prepared to order the allindana second time of all necessary witnesses, as well as to give the explicit pledge- which I had requined.
24
M 14
1866.
May
14.
This he
a een
dingly did in a
letter transmitted by the boneal and
declaring that instructions were be the judicial Commisioner of the
Province to
give
the
issued
prisoner a fair
trial and that "neither before nor after
"Sentence should he suffer any
Kind of
" torture
Ornel
punishment whatever."
15.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.